Gautam Kumar & ORS v. State & ORS
$~38 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (CRL.) 2141/2016 & Crl.M.A.11199/2016 GAUTAM KUMAR & ORS.
..... Petitioners Through :
Mr.
K.
K.
Patra and Mr.
Rohit Tripathy, Advs.
versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondents Through :
Mr. Avi Singh, ASC with Inspector Arvind Sharma PS R. K. Puram.
Mr. Krishnendu Datta and Ms. Sanjana Saddy, Advs. for R-2 & 3 with R-3 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R D E R
% 20.12.2016 Respondent nos.2 & 3 are Managing Director and Director of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd.
FIR No.977/2015 under Sections 65/66 of Information Technology Act and Sections 381/409/420 IPC was registered at police station R. K. Puram on 4th December, 2015 against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent no.2 lodged on behalf of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Petitioners and respondent no.2 have settled their disputes vide agreement dated 15th February, 2016.
Respondent no.3 is present in person; whereas respondent no.2 is represented through his counsel. Affidavit of respondent no.2 has already been placed on record wherein he has confirmed about the settlement vide the aforesaid agreement.
He further deposed in the affidavit that he has no
objection in case FIR No.977/2015 registered at police station R. K. Puram is quashed. Respondent no.3, Director of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd. is present in Court and submits that settlement has been arrived at between him and the petitioners without any undue pressure, force and coercion. He also submits that FIR may be quashed in view of the settlement. Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 for or on behalf of GAC Logistics Pvt. Ltd., FIR No.977/2015 under Sections 65/66 of Information Technology Act and Sections 381/409/420 IPC registered at police station R. K. Puram, which is at the investigation stage, is quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application is disposed of as infructuous.
A.K. PATHAK, J.
DECEMBER 20, 2016/dk