Rajesh Sachdeva v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$-60/65/66

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAILAPPLN.1422/2016andCrl.M.A. No. 10776/2016 nitin marwaha * + Thnough dsir. B.S. R.a .d'^Tatya.

Sisodia, Advs.

versus STATE(NCTOF DELHI) Through Akshai Malik;A?rwS' SI \ AND U'"®^''Yadav,P.S.UttamNagar BAILAPPLN. 1430/2016andCrl.M.A.No. 10824/2016 RAJESHsachdeva Through B.S. Rana and Mr. Safyam Sisodia, Advs.

versus STATE(NCTOF DELHI) AND ^"'^'^^^dav,P.S.UttamNagar bailAPPLN.1431/2016and Crl.M.A.No. 10825/2016 + V PARVEENJAIN Through -Mr R p ' j S^odiaAdvf STATE(NCTOFdS) Through j^.AkshaiMalik,-SI

CORAM:

P-S- UttamNagar HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEA.K.PATHAK order 20.07.2016 Thiaisacaseofroadrage. Complainanthasstatedthatone Swiftcar By:AMULYA

hithis truckno. HR-63A6797and whenhe askedthe car driveras to why they hit the truck, they startedbeatingthe complainant,his securityguard and servant. Other persons also joined them and hit them. Their car numberswere notedas DL 9CAK1213,DL 5CK4739,DL 2CAP2492 and one blackbulletbike. Counselforthepetitionerssubnntsthatvehicleshave en produceddunng the investigations. Learned APP submits that the petitionerswerenotknownto the complainantand theinjured,inasmuchas theirTIP is yetto be conducted.

Keepingin mindthe abovefacts,Iam ofthe viewthatpetitionersare not entitled to anticipatory.bail. Applications are dismissed. Other miscellaneousapplicationsalsodisposedofas infructuous. JULY 20,2016 rb