Jaideep Bhuiyan v. Govt Of NCT Of Delhi

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1410/2017 JAIDEEP BHUIYAN ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Anoj Kumar Singh, Adv.

versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Parveen Kumar, Cyber Cell/ EOW.

Mr. P. Chandra, Adv. for Mr.

Mithilesh Kumar, Adv. for complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 04.05.2017 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that he does not press the present petition, however the only condition he seeks modification is that he would furnish a bail bond in the sum of ₹1 lakh and one surety of the like amount instead of two sureties. He further undertakes if the amount of the surety bond is reduced which surety bond of course would be local person, he would furnish his address and as and when he changes his address he will duly intimate the same to the learned Trial Court. He further states that if there is any default in informing the address, the Court would be within its jurisdiction to take action in accordance with law.

CRL.M.C. 1410/2017

Consequently, retaining the order dated 28th March, 2017 granting bail to the petitioner subject to his depositing a sum of ₹5 lakhs by way of FDR of a nationalized bank in favour of the 'The District & Sessions Judge, North-West, Rohini with the learned Trial Court, which may be released by concerned Court to the rightful claimant at appropriate stage, the petitioner is admitted to bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹1 lakh with one surety bond of the like amount which surety bond would be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court. Further, as undertaken by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner, he will intimate his permanent and temporary address in the personal bond furnished and as and when he changes the address the same will be intimated to the Trial Court by way of affidavit. In case the intimation of change of address is not given and the petitioner defaults therein, the Trial Court would take action in accordance with law against him.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order dasti. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MAY 04, 2017 'ga'

CRL.M.C. 1410/2017