Deepak @ Raj v. State

$~16.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1449/2016 DEEPAK @ RAJ ..... Petitioner Through:

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 08.02.2017 Reply has been tendered by Ms. Kolluru, which is taken on record. Along with the reply, the report received from FSL dated 20.12.2016 and 19.12.2016 have been placed on record. The said FSL reports are against the petitioner. The petitioner is undergoing trial in case FIR No.292/2013 under Section 302/ 34 IPC.

In view of the aforesaid development, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The prosecution is leading its evidence. Let the remaining evidence be recorded in the case without any delay. Neither party shall seek nor be granted any undue adjournment. It is hoped that the Trial Court shall render

its decision in the next one year.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J FEBRUARY 08, 2017 B.S. Rohella