High Court of DelhiO.M.P./46/2008

Mcd v. Tarun Kr. Jain

2016-11-11Cases Pertaining To Special Benches2 pages

$~ *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P. 46/2008 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Through;

Petitioner versus Respondent TARUN KLUMAR JAIN Through:

CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR

ORDER

% 29.11.2016

1. The office note has been perused. The order dated 1 f*' November, 2016 is corrected as under:

O.M.P. 46/2008 & lA 871/2008 Petitioner MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI Through: None.

versus TARUN KLUMAR JAIN Through: None.

Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR %

ORDER

^||11.11.2016

1. None appears for the parties. The Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter.

By:AMULYA

2. Accordingly, the petition and the application are dismissed for nonprosecution. The restoration application will be entertained only if an appropriate affidavit is filed by the Petitioner in support thereof." S.MURALIDHAR, J V NOVEMBER 29, 2016 Rm