Rajesh v. State Of Delhi
$~39 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 1421/2016 RAJESH ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Kedar Yadav & Mr.Hemant Sharma, Advs.
versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr.M.P. Singh, APP.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R D E R
% 22.07.2016 Arguments heard.
The present application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.576/2015, under Sections 307/34 IPC and Sections 25/27/59 of the Arms Act, Police Station Neb Sarai.
In the present case, the FIR was registered on the basis of complaint of complainant Ajay. It was alleged that the complainant has verbal argument with one Vikram about 15 days back on the issue of his younger brother and the matter was settled. On 02.05.2015, accused Vikram met the complainant and beat him and threatened him.
The complainant escaped and hid himself in his house. At about 03.15 p.m., accused Vikram along with co-accused Rajesh and his associates Rajesh Mishra and Deendayal attacked the
complainant. It was further alleged that accused Rajesh Mishra fired at the complainant but he somehow escaped.
Neighbours of the complainant attacked the assailants with stones and bricks. Learned APP for the State has submitted that the allegations levelled against the petitioner are only with regard to exhortation and no other role has been attributed to him. It is further submitted that it was co-accused of the petitioner who used weapon at the time of incident and that he has already been granted bail. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances, the present bail application is allowed. It is hereby ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner, he be released on bail on furnishing the personal bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. However, the petitioner is directed to join the investigation as and when required. He is directed not to tamper with the evidence and not to influence the prosecution witnesses. He is further directed not to leave the country without prior permission of the Court concerned. The bail application is disposed of accordingly. Dasti.
P.S.TEJI, J JULY 22, 2016 dd