← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./1429/2017

Sushil Bharti v. State NCT Of Delhi & ANR

2017-04-13Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak1 pages

$~19 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1429/2017 SUSHIL BHARTI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Aditya Vikram, Adv.

with petitioner in person.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Arun Kr. Sharma, APP for State with SI Pankaj, P.S. Shalimar Bagh.

Mr. Dhan Mohan, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 13.04.2017 Learned APP for the State submits that both the offences are compoundable and petitioner is at liberty to approach the trial court. Accordingly, this petition is not entertained and is disposed of. However, petitioner and private respondents are at liberty to approach the trial court for compounding of the offences. Miscellaneous applications are disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

APRIL 13, 2017 ga