Deepika Kohli v. State & ANR.

$~12 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2534/2016 DEEPIKA KOHLI ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. S.C. Pandey, Adv.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through :

Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP.

Mr. Neeraj Singh, Adv. with Mr. Jai Ram Garg, Adv. with respondent Ekta Singh.

SI Baljit Singh, P.S. Paschim Vihar

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 30.08.2017 On the oral prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ajay Singh is impleaded as respondent No.3. It is submitted that petitioner and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably, therefore, FIR No. 151/2016 under Sections 406/420/34 IPC registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar on the complaint of respondent no. 2, may be quashed.

Respondent no. 2 is present in Court along with her counsel and has been identified by SI Baljit Singh, P.S. Paschim Vihar. Respondent no. 2 admits having settled the matter with the petitioner of her own free will and

without any undue force, pressure or coercion. Petitioner has paid ` 1,50,000/- to respondent No. 2, photocopy whereof has been placed on record.

Respondent no. 2 says that with this payment she has no objection if the aforesaid FIR against the respondent No.2 as also against the co-accused, respondent No.3 is quashed.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent no. 2, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 151/2016 under Sections 406/420/34 IPC registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti. A.K. PATHAK, J AUGUST 30, 2017 SRwt