Mohd. Anwar & ORS. v. State & ANR.

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2695/2016 MOHD. ANWAR & ORS.

..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ankur Sood, Ms. Romila Mandal & Mr. Uday Bedi, Advocates along with petitioners present in person.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State Respondent no.2, in person.

SI Sunita, PS Daryaganj

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 30.03.2017 1) Present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 48/2010 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Darya Ganj. It is stated that the matter has been settled with the complainant/victim amicably before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts. (2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court. The Investigating Officer present in the court has identified her. I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioners amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. Pursuant to the settlement, she has got the settled amount. Divorce has taken place. CRL. M.C. 2695/2016

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties. Settlement Agreement dated 24.07.2013 of the Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Court, recording settlement between the parties is on record.

(4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.48/2010 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Darya Ganj and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

(5) The petition is disposed of accordingly.

S.P.GARG, J.

MARCH 30, 2017/P CRL. M.C. 2695/2016