Sana @ Neeraj & ANR. v. State & ORS.

$~17.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2119/2016 SANA @ NEERAJ & ANR.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Sarfaraz Hussain, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

versus STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.

Srilina Roy, Advocate for Ms.Nandita Rao, ASC along with ASI Birender Singh, PS-Jamia Nagar, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 09.03.2017 The petitioners are present with their counsel. Learned counsel submits that they have no threat from respondent No.3 and they presently have no apprehension of any threat from respondent No.3. In these circumstances, the petition is disposed of as satisfied. However, in case the petitioners receive any threats or coercion in future, it shall be open to them to approach the concerned SHO, who shall make an assessment of the threats perceived by the petitioners and take appropriate steps.

VIPIN SANGHI, J MARCH 09, 2017 B.S. Rohella