Union Of India v. Krishan Kumar & ANR

$~8J5,16,18,21,24,26,27,29,31,33,35,39,44 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ LA.APP.232/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9339-40/2015 + LA.APP.239/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9358-59/2015 + LA.APP.240/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9362-63/2015 + LA.APP.242/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9368-69/2015 + 'LA.APP.245/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9376-77/2015 + !LA.APP.249/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9386-87/2015 + LA.APP.251/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9392-93/2015 + LA.APP.252/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9395-96/2015 + LA.APP.254/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9401-02/2015 + LA.APP.256/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9407-08/2015&9410/15 + LA.APP.258/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9419-20/2015 + • LA.APP.260/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9646/2015 + LA.APP.264/2015and (jM Appln.Nos. 9668-69/2015 + LA.APP.269/2015and CM Appln.Nos. 9698/2015 iUNIONOF INDIA Appellants Through:

Mr. JaswantSingh,Advocate versus IKANTA DEVI & ORS.

Respondent Through:

Mr. YeeshuJain,Advocate By:AMULYA

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI %

ORDER

30.10.2015 The deficiencyin courtfees in these mattershave not been made up. Learnedcounsel for the appellantstates that after the filing ol the present appeals,the judgmentofthis Court in the case ofJai Singh Vs. Union of India in LA.APP 266/2008 dt. 23.08.2011 has been affirmed by the SupremeCourt, as the SLP preferredby the Union of Indiahas since been dismissed. He, therefore,submitsthat the appellantdoes not wish to press theseappealsand for this reason,the deficientcourtfee has not been made up.

In the aforesaid circumstances,the appeals are dismissed for nonprosedution. VIPIlY SANGHI, J OCTOBER 30,2015 si