← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/6306/2016

Tejasvi Sharma v. Union Of India & ORS

2016-08-10Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva2 pages

$~27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6306/2016 TEJASVI SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Ms. Isha Khanna, Advocate.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for respondent No.1.

Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. T. Singh Dev with Ms. Puja Sarkar, Advocates for respondent No.3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

O R D E R

% 10.08.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition and seeks leave to withdraw the same.

The petitioner had filed the present petition seeking a mandamus to the respondents to issue the admit card to the petitioner for National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test - II (UG-2016) NEET II. It was contended by the petitioner that she had registered for NEET-II and had paid the requisite fee. However, the fee which was debited from the credit card of one of the relations was re-credited the following day. The petitioner was not aware of the same and it was WP(C) 6306/2016

contended that when admit card was not issued on the ground of nonpayment of fee, the petitioner approached this Court. On 21.07.2016, considering the facts of the case, the petitioner was provisionally permitted to appear in NEET-II examination. It was clarified that no equity would flow in favour of the petitioner by merely appearing in NEET-II examination by virtue of the said order. The respondent No.2 has filed the counter affidavit contending that the registration process was never completed by the petitioner and the fee was not received by the respondent No.2 and, on that ground, the respondent No.2 had not issued the admit card. Since the petitioner does not wish to press the present petition, the provisional permission granted, by order dated 21.07.2016, to the petitioner to appear in NEET-II examination is revoked.

Accordingly, the petitioner cannot avail the benefit of having appeared in the NEET-II examination and cannot have her result of NEET-II examination declared.

The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J AUGUST 10, 2016 st WP(C) 6306/2016