High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2111/2016

Jackline @ Mohd Sham Israr v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

2017-03-02Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Mukta Gupta1 pages

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2111/2016 & Crl.M.A. 10972/2016 JACKLINE @ MOHD SHAM ISRAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

None.

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with Mr. Piyush Singhal, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 02.03.2017 Even on pass over, none is present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State submits that after completion of investigation, a report has been filed qua the petitioner before the Juvenile Justice Board. The same appears to be the reason for nonappearance on behalf of the petitioner even on pass over. Petition and application are dismissed for non-prosecution. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

MARCH 02, 2017 'v mittal'