Harish v. State

$~31 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2262/2016 HARISH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Jatin Rajput, Advocate with Mr.Vikram Mathur & Mr.Anupam Dubey, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Ashish Aggarwal, ASC with SI Surender Singh, PS Inder Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 03.08.2016 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and have gone through the Nominal Roll dated 14.07.2016. The petitioner was convicted under Sections 376(2)(G)/324/506/34 IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for ten years with fine `500/-. It reveals that he has undergone seven years, five months and fourteen days incarceration besides remission for one year, nine months and ten days as on 14.07.2016. His appeal has been dismissed by this Court on 03.02.2014. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has been W.P.(CRL) 2262/2016

granted furlough / parole for various durations eight times from 2014 to 2016. The last furlough was for the period from 01.04.2016 to 15.04.2016 granted by DG(P) for two weeks. Grant of parole/ furlough can't be a regular feature.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I find no sufficient ground to grant further parole to the petitioner for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition.

4.

The writ petition is dismissed.

S.P.GARG, J AUGUST 03, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 2262/2016