Sudha Singh v. Suchin Rana
$~40 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ FAO 352/2016 SUDHA SINGH ..... Appellant Through:
Mr.Kripa Shankar, Mr.Susheel Tomar and Mr. D. S. Parmar, Advocates.
Versus
SUCHIN RANA ..... Respondent Through:
Mr. S. D. Ansari, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
% 07.03.2018 Rev. Pet. No.101/2018 This application seeks modification of the order dated 01.02.2018. At the outset, the learned counsel for the applicant submits that all the averments or allusions purporting to question the authority of the learned counsel, who had appeared for the applicant earlier, may be treated as deleted. It is so ordered.
It is the applicant's case that the electricity charges fixed in the previous order is perhaps on the higher side because the applicant occupies only a small portion of a building whose composite monthly electricity charges are in the range of Rs.12,000/-. Hence, the learned counsel for the applicant suggests that with the permission of the respondent, a sub-meter may be installed at the expense of the applicant and the charges for the electricity thus consumed alongwith the meter charges would be payable directly to the respondent.
Issue notice.
Mr. Ansari, the learned counsel accepts notice for the respondent. He states upon instructions that the respondent would have no objection to the limited relief sought, provided all the installation charges for the sub-meter including its rental, user charges and all other charges applicable to the meter alongwith the minimum charges, etc. be paid to the respondent within 15 days of any electricity bill being raised. In the circumstances, it is so ordered.
There is evidently a default in payment of the first instalment as fixed by the previous order.
The learned counsel for the applicant seeks and is granted extension of time for the payment of the said monies till 20.03.2018 subject to payment of costs of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent. In addition to the electricity bill, a sum of Rs.500/- per month towards water charges shall be paid to the respondent. Should there be any infraction of this order and the other payments directed in the order dated 01.02.2018, the said orders shall be deemed to have been vacated automatically. The application is disposed off in the above terms. NAJMI WAZIRI, J.
MARCH 07, 2018 sb