Jai Ram @ Vicky v. State
$-11 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 2278/2016 JAI RAM @VICKY Petitioner Through:
Mr. DineshMalik,Adv.
Versus
Respondent Through:
Mr. R.S. Kundu, Sr. Adv. with Insp.
Dinesh Kumar, P.S. Kanjhawla.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
ORDER
o/o 14.09.2016 File is takenup today as 13''^ September,2016 was declaredholiday on account of IduT Zuha.
Petitionerhas challengedthe order dated U' August,2016 passedby the Govt. ofNOT ofDelhiwherebyhis requestfor grantofparolehas been rejected,inter alia, on the ground that jail conduct of the petitionerwas unsatisfactoryas he was awardedpunishmenton 3'"'^March,2016. Aperusal of nominalroll shows that petitionerhas been awardedpunishmenttwice. First punishmentwas given to him on 3'^^ March, 2016; whereas second punishment was given on 29^^ March, 2016. Para 11.2 of the Parole/FurloughGuidelines,2010 envisagesthatthe conductin prisonmust By:AMULYA
have been uniformly good.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed.
A.K SEPTEMBER 14, 2016 ga