← Library
High Court of DelhiITA/530/2016

Commissioner Of Income Tax ( Intl.Taxation) v. Jc Bamford Investment

2019-05-29Hon'Ble Dr. Justice S.Muralidhar,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Asha Menon3 pages

Signed By:RAM DATT Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

I *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ ITA179/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue) versus JC BAMFORD INVESTMENT Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates.

+ ITA 687/2015 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL.TAXATION) Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue) versus JC BAMFORD INVESTMENT Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates.

+ ITA 530/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTL.TAXATION) Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue) versus JC BAMFORD INVESTMENT Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun

Singh, Advocates.

+ ITA 693/2016 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue) versus JC BAMFORD INVESTMENT LTD.

Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates.

+ ITA 369/2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXINTERNATIONAL Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel (Revenue) versus JC BAMFORD INVESTMENT Respondent Through: Mr. M.S. Syali, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mayank Nagi, Mr. Tarun Singh, Advocates.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE ASHA MENON

ORDER

% 29.05.2019

1. Upon being mentioned, these appeals are taken on Board.

2. Mr Zoheb Hossain, learned Senior Standing counsel for the Revenue has placed before the Court the letter dated 10^^ May, 2019 written to him by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1) (2), International Taxation, New Delhi permitting him to withdraw the

aforesaid appeals in view of the Resolution passed by the Competent Authority on ll"" April, 2019 under the Mutual Agreement Procedure / and the fact that the Assessee had given its acceptance to the said Resolution by its letter dated 25^*^ April, 2019.

3. The appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

ASHA MENON, J.

MAY 29, 2019 rd