Roopam Taneja v. International Recreation And Amusement Limited (Iral) & ORS.

$~CP-61 to 65 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CO.PET. 715/2016 ROOPAM TANEJA ..... Petitioner versus INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LIMITED (IRAL) & ORS. ..... Respondents + CO.PET. 726/2016 RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA ..... Petitioner versus INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LIMITED (IRAL) & ORS. ..... Respondents + CO.PET. 729/2016 PROMILA TANEJA ..... Petitioner versus INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LIMITED (IRAL) & ORS.

..... Respondents + CO.PET. 825/2016 MR. AJIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner versus INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LIMITED (IRAL) & ORS.

..... Respondents + CO.PET. 978/2016 VIHANS ARORA & ORS.

..... Petitioners versus INTERNATIONAL RECREATION AND AMUSEMENT LIMITED (IRAL) & ORS.

..... Respondents

Present:

Mr.Sushant Kumar, Mr.Anuj Midrdha, Mr.Madhup Gupta and Mr. Ashish Kasana, Advs. for the petitioners in I-61 to 63 & 65 Ms.Ananya Pandey and Mr. Deepesh Sharma, Adv. for the petitioner in Co.Pet.No.825/2016.

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv. for IRP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

O R D E R

% 31.08.2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners state that they have already filed a claim before the Insolvency Resolution Professional. Hence, they would like to withdraw the present petition.

However, they seek liberty to revive this petition, if an eventuality arises.

Granting leave and liberty, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. A copy of the order be given under the signatures of the Court Master. JAYANT NATH, J AUGUST 31, 2018 rb