Pankaj Bhatnagar v. Puneet Kumar Goel & ORS

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 538/2018 & C.M. 29234/2018 PANKAJ BHATNAGAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Nemo.

Versus

PUNEET KUMAR GOEL & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Ajay Arora & Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advocates for respondent No.1 to 3 Mr. Pradeep Kumar Jha, Advocate for respondent No.4 Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate for respondent No.5-DDA

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

O R D E R

% 20.11.2018 Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3- South Municipal Corporation of Delhi, submits that compliance of order of 22nd May, 2018, of which contempt is alleged, has been already made.

There is no appearance on behalf of petitioner. This petition and application are accordingly dismissed in default. SUNIL GAUR, J NOVEMBER 20, 2018 r