Sushil Sharma v. The State (Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2173/2016 SUSHIL SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Tyagi, Advocate versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for the State with Ms. Parul Jamwal and Mr. Varun Jamwal, Advocates SI Ompal Singh, PS Gokulpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 29.07.2016 Petitioner is an Auto Rickshaw driver.

It is submitted that petitioner's sister is neighbour of respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 along with her mother, Ponam and sister Seema were going to Yamuna Bazar in the Auto Rickshaw of petitioner. Nieces of respondent No.2, namely, Palak and Payal were also in the auto rickshaw.

The said Auto Rickshaw driven by the petitioner over turned resulting simple injuries to Ponam, Payal, Seema and respondent No .2.

They were discharged after first aid.

Respondent No. 2 and petitioners have settled their disputes. Poonam, mother of respondent No.2, who was also present in the Auto Rickshaw, is also present. They have no objection for quashing of the present FIR No. 161/2016 registered under Sections 279/337 IPC.

It may be noted that investigations are still pending.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioner and respondent Nos. 2 to 4 and in the interest of justice, FIR No. 161/2016 under Sections 279/337 IPC at Police Station Gokul Puri is quashed.

The petition is disposed of, in the above terms. A.K. PATHAK, J JULY 29, 2016 P