Santosh Bhasin v. Umari Malhotra Decd Thr Lrs

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 830/2010 SANTOSH BHASIN .....Appellant Through:

Ms. Yashi Bajpai, Advocate versus UMARI MALHOTRA DECD THR LRS .....Respondent Through:

None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

O R D E R

% 28.03.2026 1.

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2.

The present matter was listed on 02.03.2026. On account of 02.03.2026 being declared as a holiday vide notification no. 64/G-4/Genl.-I/DHC dated 27.02.2026, the same is being taken up for hearing today. 3.

The present appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the CPC, seeks the following prayers: - "a. Set-aside the Impugned Judgment dated 20.09.2010 passed by the Ld. Trial Court in suit no. 382/09/95;

b. Decree the suit filed by the Appellant and grant the reliefs as prayed for by the Appellant in the suit, which has been dismissed by the Impugned Judgment dated 20.09.2010;

c. Pass such other and further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in favour of the Appellant and against the Respondents." 4.

As per records, vide judgment dated 10.01.2024, the learned Predecessor Bench of this Court had disposed of the present appeal. However, The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:36:55

vide order dated 11.03.2024, an application, being CM Appl. No. 5722/2024, was allowed and the captioned appeal was restored to its original position and number. Thereafter, the learned Predecessor Bench of this Court had passed a judgment dated 11.03.2024, which was challenged before the Hon'ble Supreme Court, by way of SLP(C) Nos. 8653-8655/2024 and vide order dated 22.04.2024, the Hon'ble Supreme Court had directed the parties to maintain status quo the subject property.

5.

Learned counsel for the appellant points out that the aforesaid SLP has been disposed of on a settlement arrived at between the parties vide settlement agreement dated 30.04.2025 and in view of the same, the present appeal is not pressed.

6.

Ergo, in view of the above, no further directions are called for. The present appeal is disposed of as not pressed and disposed of accordingly. 7.

Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 8.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith. AMIT SHARMA, J MARCH 28, 2026 dy/db The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:36:55