Karandeep Singh v. State

$~8 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 655/2015 KARANDEEP SINGH ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Sunil K.Mittal, Advocate with Mr.L.N.Rao & Mr.Anshul Mittal, Advocates.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP with SI Bansi Lal.

Mr.Akshay Malik, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 06.04.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.2761/2014 registered under Sections 354/506/509 IPC at PS Mehrauli. Status report is on record.

2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties including the counsel for the complainant and have examined the file. By an order dated 17.04.2015, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. Vide order dated 19.02.2016, he was asked to furnish the local and BAIL APPLN. 655/2015

permanent address as well as the mobile numbers which were given and recorded in the order-sheet. The petitioner and the victim were known to each other. A case vide FIR No.704/2014 under Sections 509/506/34 IPC was earlier registered against the petitioner and others which is pending.

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J APRIL 06, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 655/2015