Mamta v. State & ANR.
32# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2923/2016 MAMTA ..... Petitioner Represented by:
Ms. Neha Garg, Advocate with petitioner in person.
versus STATE & ANR.
..... Respondents Represented by:
Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with W/ASI Anil Sharma, PS Vikas Puri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R D E R
% 12.08.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 12540/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C. 2923/2016 At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court, seeks leave to withdraw the present petition for the reason that the father of the respondent No.2 has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. Leave granted.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
AUGUST 12, 2016 'vn'