Lalit Chopra v. Rakesh Kumar Bhasin

$~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.L.P. 606/2011 LALIT CHOPRA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Amit Sanduja, Adv. for Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Adv.

versus RAKESH KUMAR BHASIN ..... Respondent Through :

None.

AND + CRL.L.P. 607/2011 LALIT CHOPRA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Amit Sanduja, Adv. for Mr. Sunil Malhotra, Adv.

versus RAKESH KUMAR BHASIN ..... Respondent Through :

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 10.08.2016 Vide order dated 5th May, 2016 last opportunity was granted to petitioner to file fresh address of respondent and serve the respondent. Steps have not been taken. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has stopped giving instructions to him. He has already written letters to petitioner but he has not responded. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks discharge for the brief. Counsel is discharged from the brief. No one appears for petitioner. Petition is dismissed in default and also for non-prosecution.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

AUGUST 10, 2016/dk