Education Promotion Society Of India And ORS v. UOI And ORS

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8860/2011 & CM APPLs. 20026/2011, 19276/2012, 2400/2015 AND 2401/2015 EDUCATION PROMOTION SOCIETY OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Bina Madhavan, Advocate with Ms. Praseena Elizabeth Joseph, Advocate.

versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan and Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, Advocates with Mr. Rachit Goel, Advocate for UOI.

Mr. Naginder Benipal, advocate for Mr. Anil Soni, Advocate for AICTE.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 24.02.2016 Learned counsel for petitioners admits that the present writ petition has become infructuous and it accordingly stands disposed of. Petitioners are given liberty to challenge the Approval Process Handbook 2016-17 issued by the AICTE in relation to the Management Programme wherein E-Journals have been made compulsory. MANMOHAN, J FEBRUARY 24, 2016 js