Sunita Sharma v. State

1# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1536/2016 SUNITA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Ms. Tulika Bhatnagar, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State SI Mukesh, EOW.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 21.09.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 11578/2016 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

BAIL APPLN. 1536/2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP on instructions submit that the petitioner has surrendered before the learned CMM on 9th September, 2016 and hence the present petition seeking anticipatory bail has become infructuous.

Bail application is dismissed as infructuous. MUKTA GUPTA, J.

SEPTEMBER 21, 2016 'vn'