Rudra Buildwell Pvt Ltd v. Matang Sinh & ORS

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 325/2015 RUDRA BUILDWELL PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate.

versus MATANG SINH & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Ankit M. Bhardwaj, Advocate for R1 & R2.

Mr.Umesh Mishra, Advocate for R3.

Ms.Vasundhra Bhardwaj, Advocate with Mr.Harsh Kumar, Advocate for R4.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL

O R D E R

% 14.02.2019 CM No.45915/2017 (for correction) 1.

Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate for the petitioner, states that due to typographical error in the order dated 23.11.2017, he has been mentioned as 'Sr. Advocate', though he has not been designated as such so far. The order stands corrected as Mr.Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate. The application stands disposed of.

CONT.CAS(C) 325/2015 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition in view of the affidavits filed by the respondents. 3.

As such, the petition along with application, being CM No.7392/2015,

is dismissed as withdrawn.

VINOD GOEL, J FEBRUARY 14, 2019.

"shailendra"