Tata Sons Limited v. Ravi Parekh & ANR

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 985/2015 & I.A.No.7409/2015 TATA SONS LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Achuthan Sreekumar with Mr.Karan Kamra, Advocates.

versus RAVI PAREKH & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sachin Gupta, Advocate for D-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

O R D E R

% 27.09.2017 I.A.No.11555/2017 Present joint application has been filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC. The same is duly signed by learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant as well as by the parties to the litigation.

Present application is also supported by the affidavits of authorized representative of the plaintiff and the defendant. Both the learned counsel state that the matter has been compromised in accordance with the settlement terms mentioned in the present joint application. They further assure and undertake to this Court that the parties shall comply with the settlement terms mentioned in the present joint application.

The statements, assurances and undertakings given by both the

counsel are accepted by this Court and the parties are held bound by the same.

This Court has also perused the settlement application and is of the opinion that the same is lawful.

Consequently, the suit is decreed in accordance with the settlement terms mentioned in the present joint application as well as the prayers mentioned in paragraphs 44 (i), (ii) and (iii) of the plaint, a copy of which is marked as Ex. C-1. Registry is directed to prepare a decree sheet accordingly.

Registry is also directed to issue to an authorised representative of the plaintiff a certificate authorizing him/her to receive back from the Collector the half amount of the Court fee paid in respect of the present claim.

With the aforesaid observations, present application is allowed and the suit and pending application stand disposed of. The interim order dated 15th April, 2015 stands vacated. MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 KA