Ved Parkash Malhotra v. Delhi Development Authority And ANR

$~14 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7738/2016 VED PARKASH MALHOTRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Petitioner-in-person.

Versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Ajay Verma, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Vaibhav Mishra & Mr. Ishaan Verma, Advs. for DDA.

Mr. Akshay Makhija, CGSC with Ms. Namisha Gupta, GP, Ms. Sanjugeeta Moktan, Mr. Sumant Bhushan & Ms. Shivi Sanyam, Advs. for R-2/UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 02.09.2016 CM No.31943/2016 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) No.7738/2016 & CM No.31942/2016 (directions) As we could see, the averments in the writ petition are extremely vague and the relief sought also lacks clarity. In the circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition in proper form, if so advised. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. CHIEF JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J SEPTEMBER 02, 2016/kks