Jai Kishan @ Tinku v. State ( Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3079/2016 JAI KISHAN @ TINKU ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Ranjit Singh, Adv. with petitioner.

versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ..... Respondent Represented by:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with SI Arun Kumar, PS FP Beri.

Mr. S.P. Singh, Adv. for R-2 with R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 29.08.2016 Crl.M.A. 13255/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.C 3079/2016 By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.621/2014 under Sections 354/323/427 IPC registered at PS Fatehpur Beri on the complaint of respondent No.2 on the ground that parties have settled the matter.

Notice.

Learned APP for the State accepts notice and on instructions states that in the above-noted FIR the petitioner is the only accused and respondent No.2 is the only victim/complainant.

Respondent No.2 is present in Court and is identified by her counsel and the investigating officer. She states that she has settled the matter with

the petitioner who is her neighbour and does not wish to pursue the abovenoted FIR and proceedings pursuant thereto. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No.621/2014 under Sections 354/323/427 IPC registered at PS Fatehpur Beri, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

The petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

AUGUST 29, 2016 'v mittal'