Vijay Kalra v. State

$~1 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 2214/2014 & CRL.M.B. 10680/14 VIJAY KALRA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Sushil Kumar, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Raghuvinder Varma, APP.

SI Manju.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 04.03.2016 1.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case FIR No.448/2014 registered under Sections 354/323 IPC at PS Narayana. Status report / additional status report is on record. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file. By an order dated 01.10.2014, the petitioner was granted interim protection and was directed to join the investigation as and when required. Undisputedly, the petitioner has joined the investigation since then. Transcript of the CD has been placed on record. However, learned APP has failed to point out anything serious attributed to the petitioner in the conversation. BAIL APPLN. 2214/2014

3.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, he be released on furnishing personal bond in the sum of ` 40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the SHO/Investigating officer. He shall, however, join the investigation as and when required.

4.

The bail application stands disposed of. Pending application also stands disposed of.

S.P.GARG, J MARCH 04, 2016 / tr BAIL APPLN. 2214/2014