Titu v. State

$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2280/2018 TITU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mannavt Kahai Singh, Adv. for Mr. Saurabh Soni, Adv.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Singhal, Adv. for Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State with SI Deepak, P.S.

Jahangir Puri.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 31.07.2018 Parole was rejected to the petitioner because his conduct in jail for the previous one year was informed to be not good. Now, the period of one year is over. Therefore, the petitioner can make a fresh application before the concerned authority.

The petition is disposed off in the above terms. NAJMI WAZIRI, J JULY 31, 2018/acm