Jai Bhagwan v. State

$~41 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1589/2016 JAI BHAGWAN ..... Petitioner Through Mr.S.R. Parashar and Mr.Anand Parashar, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP with ASI Jai Bhagwan, PS Nihal Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI

O R D E R

% 08.08.2016 Arguments heard.

The present application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for the grant of regular bail in FIR No.507/2016, under Sections 452/323/506/380/448/186/332/34 IPC, Police Station Nihal Vihar.

The facts in brief are that the FIR of the instant case was registered on the complaint of complainant Pooja. It is alleged that the complainant is having three daughters and the accused including her in laws are willing for a son. They have taken all steps to throw the complainant out of her dwelling unit and reportedly left her and her three minor daughters even without essential articles after committing theft of her articles.

It has been submitted that the petitioner was arrested by the

police on 25.06.2016 and since then he is in custody. The investigation qua the petitioner is already complete and he is not required for further investigation. The complainant and accused are the family members and the dispute is of domestic nature relating the property.

The fact remains that the petitioner was arrested on 25.06.2016 and since 26.06.2016 he is in judicial custody. The petitioner is no more required for investigation or custodial interrogation. The trial of the case is yet to commence and no fruitful purpose would be served to be keep the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period. In the facts and circumstances, the petitioner is admitted to bail. He is ordered to be released on furnishing the personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. The petitioner is directed not to tamper with the evidence or influence the prosecution witnesses. He is further directed not to leave the country without prior permission of the Court concerned.

Application is allowed accordingly.

P.S.TEJI, J AUGUST 08, 2016 dd