Jeevan Kumar v. Dy. Director Directorate Of Enforcement

$~148 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 5229/2013 JEEVAN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms. Radhika Arora, Advocate.

versus DY. DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 22.01.2024 CRL.M.A. 2040/2024 1.

By way of present application, it is submitted that the appearance of petitioner's counsels namely Mr.Vikas Arora, Ms.Radhika Arora and Mr.Siddharth Singh were not marked in the judgment dated 15.01.2024 though the counsels were present.

2.

A perusal of the aforementioned judgment shows that though the petitioner was represented through the counsels, however inadvertently their names were not noted.

3.

Considering the aforesaid, let the petitioner's counsels' appearance be read as marked in the judgment dated 15.01.2024. 4.

Application is disposed of.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JANUARY 22, 2024/ga The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/06/2024 at 14:40:29