Sumeet Nagpal v. Shiv Raj

$-18 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ FAQ 327/2014 SUMEETNAGPAL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate versus SHIV RAJ Respondent Through: Mr. Manohar Nagesh, Advocate CORAM;

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

ORDER

% 08.12.2015 The learned counsel for the appellant says that since entire money has been received under the settlement agreement dated 16.07.2015 though, after some delay, he has instructions to convey to the court that the appellant does not wish to press the appeal any further. The captioned appeal is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. The appeal be consigned to record.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J DECEMBER 08, 2015 yg By:AMULYA