Arvind Singh v. State & ORS

46# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1513/2017 ARVIND SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners Represented by:

Mr. R.S. Dakha and Mr. Sunny Jain, Advocates.

versus STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State with SI Jitender, PS K.N.

Katju Marg.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 17.04.2017 By the present petition the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 326/2008 under Sections 448/380/506/34 IPC registered at PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi on the complaint of Respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter. Learned APP for the State on instructions submits that in the above noted FIR the four petitioners are the only accused and the respondent No.2 the complainant/victim Respondent No.2 is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer. He states that he has settled the matter with the petitioners before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts on 9th April, 2014. He further states he does not wish to pursue the above noted FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and will abide by the terms of the CRL.M.C. 1513/2017

settlement.

Petitioners who are present in Court and are identified by learned counsel affirm the statement of respondent No. 2 and state that they will abide by the terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Court, Delhi on 9th April, 2014. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

Consequently, FIR No. 326/2008 under Sections 448/380/506/34 IPC registered at PS Prashant Vihar, Delhi and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.

Petition is disposed of. Order dasti.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

APRIL 17, 2017 'vn'

CRL.M.C. 1513/2017