High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/2587/2016

Manish Tahim v. State & ANR

2016-09-05Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vipin Sanghi1 pages

$~39.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2587/2016 and CRL.M.A. 13746/2016 MANISH TAHIM ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. J.S. Vohra, Advocate.

versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC and Ms.Parul Jamwal & Mr. Peeyush Bhatia, Advocates along with SI Parmjit Singh, PS-Connaught Place, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 05.09.2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw the petition. He submits that the petitioner shall pursue such other rights & remedies as are available to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is possessed of documents which would completely belie the case of the complainant. It is open to the petitioner to produce all such documents before the Investigating Officer.

Dismissed as withdrawn.

VIPIN SANGHI, J SEPTEMBER 05, 2016 B.S. Rohella