Sanjeev Kumar Bidhuri v. Delhi Development Authority And ORS

$-29 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7034/2016 SANJEEV KUMAR BIDHURI Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sushil Kr.Jain, Adv.

versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS Respondent Through:

Ms.Mrinalini Sen Gupta with Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advs. for DDA.

Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. for DJB.

Ms.Swaty Singh Mahk with Ms.Prachi Sharma, Advs. for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

ORDER

% 10.08.201 6 1.

This petition by way of Public Interest Litigation has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondents to demolish the old/hazardous bore-well existing on the footpath of DDA land adjacent Jatav Basti, Village Tekhand (opposite side Prime Tower F-79/80) Okhia, Phase-1, New Delhi.

2. We have the learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that the petitioner had in fact made a representation to the respondents on 15.06.2016 bringing to their notice about the hazardous bore-well. It is submitted that the respondents failed to take any action.

3. In the facts and circumstances, we dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent Nos.I to 3 to look into the issues raised by the petitioner treating the writ petition as a representation and take appropriate action following due process of law if the averments in the writ petition are fV.P.fCJ 7034/2016 Page I of2 By:AMULYA

found to be true. The action taken shall be communicated to the petitioner within four weeks from today.

4. It is open to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition in case necessity thereof arises.

CHIEF JUSTICE SANGIT^HINORA SEHGAL, J AUGUST 10, 2016/pmc W.P.(C) 7034/2016 of 2