Shakuntla v. State (NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

\ W-/ $-20-21 - • *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1164/2016 NALVEER & ORS Petitioners Through : Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate along with petitioners present in person.

versus THE STATE & ANR (N.C.T OF DELHI) Respondent Through: Mr.Kamal Kr.Ghei, APP.

R-2/Complainant present with her mother.

SI Jaspal Singh, PS Vijay Vihar.

+ CRL.M.C. 2883/2016 SHAKUNTLA Petitioner Through : Mr.Rishi Pal Singh, Advocate along with petitioner present in person.

versus STATE (NOT OF DELHI) & ANR Respondents Through : Ms.Meenkshi Dahiya, APP.

'R-2/Complainant present with her mother.

4^ n SI Jaspal Singh, PS Vijay Vihar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.

JUSTICE S.P.GARG

ORDER

% 17.11.2016

(1) Present petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. have been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0672/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPG registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar. It is. "stated that, the matter has been settled with the complainant/victim , amicably before Family Courts, Rohini.

. Crl.M.C.1164/16 & 2883/16 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

(2) Respondent No.2-complainant is present before the Court with her mother. The Investigating Officer present in the court has identified her. I have enquired from the complainant whether the matter has been settled with the petitioners amicably without fear and pressure. She has informed that the matter has been settled without any fear or pressure and she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR. It is informed that pursuant to the settlement demand draft bearing No.054295 dated 15.11.2016 for the sum of ?2,00,000/- of Bank of Baroda has been handed over to the complainant today in the court. Divorce by mutual consent has been granted.

(3) The petition is supported by the affidavits of the parties. Joint statements dated 02.02.2016 of petitioner No.l (Nalveer) and the complainant recording settlement between the parties before Principal Judge, Family Courts, Rohini, is on record.

(4) Since the complainant/Respondent No.2 has voluntarily settled the dispute with the "petitioners, no useful purpose will be served to n • continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to put an end to the litigation and to enable the parties to settle in life after divorce, FIR No.0672/2013 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar and all the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.-

(5) The petitions are disposed of accordingly. ^ J.P.GARG, J.

NOVEMBER 17,2016/sa CrlMC.1164/16 & 2883/16