Hemant @ Goldy v. State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~10.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1696/2016 and Crl.M.B. No.1519/2016 HEMANT @ GOLDY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Ashish Deep Verma & Ms.Manasi Agarwal, Advocates.

versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP and Ms.Ankita Goyal, Advocate along with SI Manish Kumar, PS-Shalimar Bagh, for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 05.12.2016 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner shall be satisfied in case the remaining prosecution evidence is recorded expeditiously so that he may be able to prefer regular bail thereafter.

From the status report, it appears that out of 21 prosecution witnesses, evidence of 14 prosecution witnesses stands recorded, and only 7 are remaining. The next date of hearing is 11.12.2016 before the Trial Court. The Trial Court is directed that the evidence of the remaining prosecution

witnesses is recorded without any delay and no adjournment shall be sought either by the prosecution or by the accused, and it is hoped that the evidence of remaining prosecution witnesses shall be recorded within the next two months of 11.12.2016.

The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 05, 2016 B.S. Rohella