Sumit Kumar v. Union Of India & ORS

$~39.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8546/2018 SUMIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. U. Srivastava, Adv.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Uniyal with Mr. Dhawal Uniyal, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 08.05.2019 On the last date of hearing, it was stated on behalf of the respondents that no appeal dated 24.12.2014 of the petitioner is found on the respondent's record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has acknowledgement of receipt of the said appeal. In any event, since the respondents state that they do not have a copy of the said appeal, we leave it to the petitioner to submit another copy of the appeal within one week. Along with the said copy, the petitioner should also provide to the respondents, copy of the acknowledgement of the appeal as stated to have been originally filed. Other documents relating to condonation of delay in filing the appeal should also be filed. In case, the petitioner files the copy of the appeal in terms of this order, the respondents should consider the same, including on the aspect of condonation of delay.

The respondents should pass a reasoned order within 6 weeks of receipt of the copy of the appeal along with the documents as aforesaid. The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J REKHA PALLI, J MAY 08, 2019 N.Khanna