Sadhna Gupta & ORS v. State & ORS

$~11 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.L.P. 477/2016 SADHNA GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Vibhor Garg, Mr. Sumit Kumar Mihsra and Mr. Rishabh, Advocates.

Versus

STATE & ORS ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Ravi Nayak, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State with Inspector Sanjay Dutt, Special Cell.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

O R D E R

% 20.07.2017 The present leave petition has been instituted on behalf of the complainant, who happens to be the widow of the deceased victim. Mr.Garg, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the leave petitioner, states that in view of the circumstance that the State too has preferred a leave petition being Crl. L.P. No.650/2016, titled as "State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Vs. Afroz @ Feroz @ Pehlwan", against the order impugned herein, he will not press this leave petition if liberty is granted to the complainant to assist the Court at the time when the connected leave petition filed by the State is taken up for hearing.

Leave and liberty is granted.

The leave petition is disposed off whilst reserving liberty to the complainant to assist the Court at the time of hearing the said connected leave petition filed by the State.

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.

NAJMI WAZIRI, J.

JULY 20, 2017 sb