Sitac Re Pvt. Ltd. v. Ernst & Young Llp

4# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 283/2017 SITAC RE PVT. LTD.

..... Plaintiff Represented by:

Ms. Diya Kapur, Advocate.

versus ERNST & YOUNG LLP ..... Defendant Represented by:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 24.10.2017 I.A. No. 12212/2017 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC r/w Section 151 CPC) 1.

At the outset learned counsel for the plaintiff states that the present application be treated as one under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC since the application has been filed by the plaintiff seeking withdrawal of the suit in terms of the settlement.

2.

Application is treated as one under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC. 3.

Application is disposed of permitting the plaintiff to withdraw the suit.

CS(COMM) 283/2017 1.

Since I.A. No. 12212/2017 is supported by the affidavit of Mr. Arjun Singh Puri, the authorised signatory of the plaintiff, suit is disposed of as withdrawn.

CS(COMM) 283/2017

2.

Court fee be returned to the plaintiff under Section 16A of the Court Fee Act.

I.A. No. 4694/2017 (under Order II Rule 2 (3) CPC) Application is disposed of as infructuous.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

OCTOBER 24, 2017 'vn'

CS(COMM) 283/2017