Om Prakash And ORS v. Mcd And ANR

$~7 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 697/2015 & CM APPL.13608/2015 OM PRAKASH AND ORS ..... Petitioners Through:

None.

versus MCD AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Suil Goel, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr.

Mayank Goel, Advocate for R-1.

Mr.

Roshan Lal Goel, Standing Counsel with Ms.

Anju Gupta, Advocate for R-2/SDMC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA

O R D E R

% 20.04.2018 There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on the matter being called out repeatedly since morning, even though, it was passed over awaiting appearance in the forenoon. It is 4.20 p.m. The position remains the same.

Counsel for the respondent no.2 submits that as per the telephonic communication received from counsel for the petitioner, the suit in which the impugned order was passed has already been dismissed by the Trial Court and that the petition has become infructuous. The petition and the application filed therewith are dismissed in default.

R.K.GAUBA, J.

APRIL 20, 2018/Rekha