Ashok Kumar Meena v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ANR

$~32 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 7447/2016 ASHOK KUMAR MEENA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr. Raman Duggal, Mr.Arun Kumar Panwar, Advocates.

versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondent Through :

Mr. Rahul Singh, Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for R1/NDMC.

Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel for R2/SDMC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 23.08.2016 The OA filed by the petitioner before the Central Administrative Tribunal has been dismissed in limine only on the ground that the petitioner has failed to implead the proper and necessary parties. Learned counsels enter appearance respectively on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 on advance notice.

At the outset, Mr. Duggal, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no objection to implead necessary parties and for that a proper application would be filed before the Tribunal. Accordingly, in view of the stand taken, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the Tribunal. However, the Tribunal will take up the matter for hearing only after an application seeking

impleadment of necessary parties is filed by the petitioner. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on 31st August, 2016.

A copy of this order be given dasti to the parties. G.S.SISTANI, J I.S.MEHTA, J AUGUST 23, 2016 j