High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/8243/2016

Vinod Chopra v. M/S Novelty Emporium

2019-04-09Hon'Ble Mr. Justice J.R. Midha1 pages

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8243/2016 VINOD CHOPRA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Sanjoy Ghose, Adv.

versus M/S NOVELTY EMPORIUM ..... Respondent Through:

Mr.K.C. Dubey, proxy counsel for Mr.Raj Rishi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

O R D E R

% 06.02.2019 A request for an adjournment is made on behalf of learned counsel for the respondent. The request is not opposed. Written synopsis of the parties are not on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the same was already filed in February, 2018. He prays for and is granted three weeks' time to check up with the Registry and have the same placed on record after removing objections, if any.

Learned counsel for the respondent is also granted one last opportunity of three weeks to file written synopsis failing which the matter will be heard on the basis of pleadings already on record. List on 09.04.2019.

REKHA PALLI, J FEBRUARY 06, 2019/gm