Rajbala v. Dena Bank & ORS

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3518/2017 & CMs 15365-66/2017 RAJBALA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sunil K. Jha with Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates versus DENA BANK & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Karan Khanna with Ms. Asmita Kumar, Advocates for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL

O R D E R

% 24.04.2017 1.

The petitioner has assailed the order dated 11.4.2017 passed by the DRT-I, Delhi in the present proceedings without approaching the DRAT by preferring an appeal.

2.

The present petition has been listed subject to an office objection with regard to its maintainability.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, while reserving the right of his client to file an appeal before the DRAT, as per law.

4.

Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn along with the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J APRIL 24, 2017/sk