Shambhu Nath Pandey v. State

$~38 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2521/2016 SHAMBHU NATH PANDEY ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Bijender Singh, PS O.I.A.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 29.08.2016 1.

Present petition has been preferred by the petitioner for seeking parole for three months. Status report not filed. 2.

I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have examined the file.

Nominal Roll dated 27.07.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Sections 366/376 IPC and was sentenced to undergo RI for seven years with fine `6,000/-. Crl.A. 1418/2011 was dismissed by this Court on 17.09.2012. Nominal Roll further reveals that only four months and twenty-six days are left in completion of the sentence awarded to him as on 25.07.2016. It further records that the petitioner was granted parole / furlough on various occasions.

Lastly, he availed furlough from 07.06.2016 to 22.06.2016.

W.P.(CRL) 2521/2016

3.

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, I find no sufficient reasons to grant further parole particularly when small portion of the sentence remains to be completed. 4.

The petition is dismissed.

S.P.GARG, J.

AUGUST 29, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 2521/2016