Akshay v. State (Gnct Delhi)

$~48.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 2462/2016 AKSHAY ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Yogesh Swaroop and Rakesh Kumar, Advocates versus STATE (GNCT DELHI) ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP with SI Ramesh Kumar, PS Sultanpuri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 01.12.2016 Crl. M.A. No. 18749/2016 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.

Crl. M.A. No. 18750/2016 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in refiling is condoned. The application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 2462/2016 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he shall be satisfied in case the trial court is directed to record the evidence of the complainant, eye witnesses as well as the public witnesses, if any, expeditiously.

It is seen that the trial court has first decided to record the evidence of the formal witnesses. The trial court is directed to give precedence to record the evidence of the complainant, eye witnesses as well as the public witnesses, if any. Let the same be done without any delay. The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. VIPIN SANGHI, J DECEMBER 01, 2016 sr