← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/3427/2017

Mukesh Kumar v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force And ANR

2017-04-24Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A. K. Chawla2 pages

$~3 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3427/2017 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajiv Kumar Jha, Adv.

versus DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE AND ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. Prasanta Varma, SCGC with Ms.

Prativa Rani Varma, Adv.

for respondent no.1.

Mr. Vishwa Bhushan Arya, Adv. for respondent no.2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 24.04.2017 Mr. Vishwa Bhushan Arya, Adv. has entered appearance on behalf of National Thermal Power Corporation-respondent no.2 and states that the petitioner has not made a written claim for payment of HRA. He submits that in case the claim is made, it would be verified and if found to be correct, payment would be made in accordance with law.

The petitioner, who is present in person, submits that he had sent letters dated 5.7.2016 and 22.8.2016 (Annexures P7 & P8) to the Manager (GM) & (HR). On being asked, the petitioner states that he has not brought with him the proof of service or dispatch.

Be that as it may, we feel that the petition can be disposed of at the admission stage itself in view of the statement made by learned counsel for NTPC.

Petitioner would go to the office of the counsel for respondent no.2 on 1st May, 2017 at 2.15 p.m. alongwith the relevant papers. Learned counsel for the respondent no.2 would call the concerned official from NTPC and the papers would be handed over to the said official.

In case of any deficiency or clarification, the petitioner would be informed. The petitioner thereafter, will directly send the papers and clarification to the said official, who would be present in the meeting on 1.5.2017.

The claim of the petitioner, if, found to be correct, would be paid to the petitioner within one month from the date when papers/documents are submitted.

In case, the petitioner still has any grievance, he would be entitled to move a fresh petition.

Writ petition is disposed of in the above terms, with no order as to costs.

Dasti.

SANJIV KHANNA, J ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA, J APRIL 24, 2017/rc